rpanons | Trapped in the city of one loo

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

tbh, i think most au games should be oc only, but that's a topic for another day. i don't see anything wrong with someone opening a game that's just for ocs. they used to have them on lj back when most games didn't allow for ocs. so have a game or two here that's oc only. if there's only one-two games that are niched for specific genres/fandoms, getting upset about it is just dumb when there's so many other games out there. people are way too entitled about shit lately. 'wah, i like this premise but ew smut/wah i like this premise but ew ocs/wah, i like this premise but why no ocs/wah too much this, too much that wah wah me'

What would be the point of an OC-only AU game? Then you'd all just be crafting OCs for the specific setting and...it'd be a regular OC-only game, not an AU game. I don't mind OCs in AU games or anything, but for me the appeal of an AU game is taking an existing character and reworking them.

i think it's preference more than anything. i'm not a fan of au games because i personally don't feel like a lot of my characters would carry over well and still be themselves if they didn't have their life experiences, in which case they'd basically be an oc with the name/face of my canon char. but lots of people like aus and i'm not going to be that asshole that says they shouldn't exist. i just don't play in them and don't enjoy playing against au versions of canon chars so i avoid places where that's an issue.

it sounds like au games just aren't your thing, then, instead of oc-only au games being better

personally i love translating life experiences/personality/etc into an au, but i get that not everyone does

i totally agree with you and i didn't so much say that they're 'better' as much as that's what i'd prefer, but, yeah. and in terms of new experiences, again, for me it comes down to character types. there are certain canons/genres where taking them out of that element and giving them more mundane and banal experiences takes them from being a recognizable version of altered char a and being an oc that has no semblance to char a and is now char x.

example; any of the guardians from rise of the guardians. tooth and easter bunny and jack and santa... great characters and fun to play, but humanizing them and making them high school students/teachers in a mundane world takes away from the characters if they're not a giant bunny or a feathery tooth guardian or a flying ice boy who died a long time ago. there's a base you can work with, yeah, but to fit them into certain (and i say certain and not all) aus would detract from them as a character and turn jack into an emo teen prankster and bunny into some kind of twitchy phys ed teacher. sure, they'd be fun to play, but they're not them, you know?

and for some people, that's exactly what they want to play and that's fine and i don't fault them that. but i generally pick up x char because i want to play x char in y scenario, not x if x was a unicorn.

wouldnt that just be an oc game though, rather than an au game that's oc only

im not saying theres anything wrong with oc-only games, btw, just that oc-only and au seems mutually exclusive?

i guess it would be. i had another discussion somewhere about au chars basically being ocs and i think that's sort of made me feel like au games should just be for ocs which would, yeah, make it an oc game. i guess it's just perspective since to me, i feel like a lot of au versions of chars are essentially canon based ocs, but people still seem to like it and that's fine and not a problem at all. play what you want, right?

i think it depends on the approach to auing. a lot of people who like AUs like them because they get to use a favorite OU as a pb for an OC and have people stroke them for it, no lie. but on the other hand there are people who just like to take on the challenge of adapting a character without losing their core.

i see it both ways because im a comics fan so i remember stuff like elseworlds or whatever where superman grows up in russia or the justice league are in the wild west. and some of those stories were great - genuine explorations of the characters we love but in a different context that makes us think about how much of that character is their nature and how much came from who raised them and in what context. but then some of them were crap and basically just like totally unrelated characters wearing similar clothes.

me, i like aus in theory as long as they stick to the first formula, but its impossible to avoid the second formula when you actually join such a game and that discourages me from them.

but thats another story i guess

Trapped in the city of one loo

original da

Re: original da

ayrt

Re: ayrt

ayrt

Re: original da

ayrt

ayrt