rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2016-01-05 03:19 pm

Found the token ace

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Statutory rape is not the same as what most people consider rape as it's based around the technicality of "X was too young to consent even if they've done it wholeheartedly." An 18-year-old fucking a 17-year-old is also statutory rape, no matter if the 17-year-old was consenting.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
uhhh isn't it rape when you fuck someone who is not in a the correct mind to consent either?

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
that chicken just wants attention and money even tho she didn't paint her fucker in a bad light or anything and we should definitely focus on how much of a liar the chicken is as opposed to scrutinizing her fucker

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
like above anon said, there's a very big difference between statutory rape and rape. lots of consenting couples get slapped with stat rape because one ages out of the 'acceptable age range' and the parents can use it as an excuse. not to mention there's a huge difference between having sex with someone without their consent and having sex with a minor. tbh, i think the term should be changed to something else because no one can see past the word 'rape', which brings to mind forceful and unwanted sex.

sixteen would have been of the age to consent, which could very well be how old he thought she was. there are loads of stories of 20+ guys (and girls) having sex with minors and not knowing because they either didn't think to ask or they were lied to. if a girl tells you she's eighteen and she looks eighteen, you're not going to ask her for her id. finding out she's twelve or thirteen can come as a legitimate surprise to the other party. it happens a lot and has happened a lot in the past, particularly with famous people. (not to say there aren't some roman polanskys here and there, but there's a difference)

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)
the point is that there really isn't a huge difference. thirteen years old is a child who should not be having sex with a thirty-year-old. don't bring up the 17/18 example like it's remotely comparable to what we're talking about.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
It's also an extension of the "I'M MATURE FOR MY AGE" thing, basically. There's a fair number, in my experience, who lie about their age because they believe they should be treated like they're older than they are.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
We get it, you want the icky cishet famous man to burn in hell.

Even the woman's account in this case states she enjoyed it. She obviously doesn't even think of it as rape, and in this case, yes, she consented and probably at the time believed she was ready like most "I'm Mature For My Age" people can think. It's still fucked up, no one's saying that, but it's not like he forced her down and left her to rot in the gutter.

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
out of curiosity, where do you rp? been thinking about looking for new rp places but not sure where

Re: invite-only games

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I had thought of doing the first round open, actually.

I also have plenty of players I've played with before/know are good, but don't necessarily currently have added that I could invite. Similarly, not all my rp-friends know each other, so I'd be sending out invites to 30-40 people, if I did go the 'private invite' route. I'm not too worried about getting figured out.

Serious question though: would you play in an invite-only game if you didn't know the mod? (Assuming you figure it's a friend.)

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:16 pm (UTC)(link)
...slightly off-topic, but: which is almost always good evidence that they're not, because if they were actually mature for their age, they would understand that it's not about them and how ~exceptional~ they are

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
smh at these "rape tier" excusers

shame on david bowie for doing this, it doesn't matter that he didn't "actually force himself on her"

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
okay? i never said he did? but he still did something reprehensible

Re: poll/question

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:17 pm (UTC)(link)
In the past I used to go in blind to the taken list because I would join based entirely on premise or on invites from friends.

Now I double-check the same standards as y'all; I swing to less anime characters, but also check for a healthy population of adult characters.

I also check to see if the OC population's doing fairly well. Usually games don't have more than a handful, but if the ones that are there are substandard in some way (my gauge often goes by urban-fantasy LA-PB's who are especially arrogant or 2 cool... and I'd be lying if very badly drawn icons weren't a sign, but more of what I'm looking at is how thought-out the character is and whether their history and world are rich and fun to read about!)

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I was going to say Sense8 but technological super powers threw me off.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
unless she walked up to him and said 'hi david, i'm thirteen and a virgin and i want you to fuck me', he had no way of actually knowing. i'm not saying that she should have done it or he should have had sex with her, but i'm saying that there is a small bit of leeway to grant him since it's very likely he wasn't aware of her age. if he thought she was sixteen, that was legal.

i don't know why you people think that it's always just that easy to tell how old people are just by looking at them. i know plenty of pre-teens that look like adults and plenty of adults that people still think are kids. we don't age universally. we're not psychic. we don't have our ages on our foreheads. it's not as simple as saying 'he shouldn't have'. if he didn't know, you can't claim the same thing as if he did.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
my eyes just glazed over.

Re: invite-only games

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I've been struggling to think of a good way of wording this, but not only would I not play in this game, I'd have a very strong, visceral, fuck no reaction to it.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
literally no one thinks that, though. i absolutely can claim he still shouldn't have done it. not knowing you did a thing and not meaning to do a thing does not mean you didn't do the thing, and i don't know why you're so dead fucking set on defending him instead of going "yeah, that was gross, but i still appreciate him for his work/as a symbol"

Re: invite-only games

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I'd rather the honest truth than none at all!

Thanks, anon. Guess I'll rethink my plans. Maybe a hard cap is the way to go.

Re: invite-only games

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Serious Answer: Yes.

But the thing here that I feel is missing out of all of this has nothing to do with modding and everything to do with 'If I like the game premise'. I don't give a shit who mods what (unless it's Kaeyvin or Stormy or Ken), but I'm not going to join a game just because I get an invite. I want to be interested in the game premise. Concentrate less on asking if people would want to join because of anon modding and more on if you actually have something they'd want to join. If you've got something interesting enough, I'd definitely join, anon modding or no.

da

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:35 pm (UTC)(link)
i think it also happens because people do one a day, meaning that you tag them back (or out) and probably don't get anything back until you're unable to reply for whatever reason.

people have more shit to do now because we all grew up. we can't stay online until 4am boomeranging any more or sit at the computer tagging all day during school holidays.

Re: invite-only games

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:37 pm (UTC)(link)
clockbox managed it

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Not much to add to this except that I really like the cut of your jib. Thanks for the giggle!

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
i used to rp on tumblr before the formatting bullshit became too much for me to deal with, and now I just solicit my rp partners from there and periodically trawl rp w/me posts here for people who play from my fandoms

as for platforms, i do email and gdocs because i don't care about icons/gifs/etc. and only want to write prose these days

+1

(Anonymous) 2016-01-11 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)
for that, for aai2, for everything capcom holds hostage because promoting their games is haaaard