rpanons | I'm bad at this

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme. Your unfunny, forced memes also fall under this rule.
Do not treat this comm like your personal therapist. Threads about nonfictional suicide, self injury, rape, and abuse will be deleted. There are better resources out there for you.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.
Shut up about Tumblr. If it's not a discussion about Tumblr RP it will be deleted.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Cartoons are still not fucking child porn and I find the equivalence disgusting.

I find the idea that there's any moral equivalence between images created through the rape of a child and images created by a pen on a page far more disgusting than any illustration could ever be.

I can see why people would think that since there have (apparently) been reports of pedophiles using sexual drawings of kid characters to groom children for sexual abuse, and I personally find that kind of art kind of gross, but I agree that they're not actually the same thing.

I'm sure someone somewhere has done that (although the lack of sources whenever that claim is made by moral crusaders makes me wonder prevalent it actually is) but ultimately even in cases where it's used it's not the relevant factor in whether or not the would-be offender succeeds in seducing his or her target. The actual objectives of grooming are to gain the child's trust and to isolate them from parents or other adults who might intervene. According to a report by a police officer who specialized in child sexual assault cases which I read a year and a half ago (and which I can no longer find, and I don't remember the author's name; sorry), if the offender is in a position of trust, and manages to get the kid alone (the specific example he used was creating a situation where the child would be forced to stay the night or change clothes), the offender is almost guaranteed to succeed in persuading the child to have sex with him/her. Those two factors are so huge that all others are essentially negligible.

Basically, by the time the pedophile would be in a position to show the kid porn in order to persuade them to have sex, the grooming phase is over. They've already succeeded.

I'm bad at this

Re: STEVEN UNIVERSE

+1000

Re: +1000

Re: +1000

Re: +1000