rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2015-06-01 09:50 am

Warning: contains peanuts

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

(Anonymous) 2015-06-01 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
enough information to go off for what? the questions thread for this plot post is open. people have been getting answers in a timely manner. i agree the neraki plot could have been handled better, but it isn't comparable to what people are talking about here.

i still don't see the issue with this plot, apart from the fact that the ooc post could have gone up sooner.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-01 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)
oh my god im not going over the same exact argument in the last post

isn't comparable to what? there have been NO pastebins. i can't judge what you're talking about if you don't show me what's got you so annoyed

the last thread also had no pastebins. i'm starting to sense a pattern here

(Anonymous) 2015-06-01 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)
that these plurks are made up despite several anons admitting they exist...? including anons who say they aren't whining plurks? the plurks are real.

but the anon was talking about comparing two plots not comparing two plurks.

(Anonymous) 2015-06-02 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
several anons haven't admitted they exist. that's the thing about anons they could all be the same person. that is why actual pastebins are important. and considering the timestamps on this conversation and how sharply they drop off i'm willing to bet it's only two or three people complaining.

and even if there are fifty anons arguing how annoying these whining plurks are, the fact that no one on this post or the post preceding it has deigned to cough up a pastebin is suspicious as fuck.