rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2014-07-12 02:26 pm

Little Cleansers and Dominions

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME | TEST DRIVES

Re: Is it true?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-12 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I think they're just more nitpickier than most rather than hard for whatever reason.

Amat used to be infamous for judging the sexuality section and picking it apart way more than it needed to be. Especially when the sexuality section is rather useless since people apped in straight characters to bang with the same sex immediately all the time.

Easiest: My Little Jamjar, Drama Drama Duck, Ruby City. If you can string together a bunch of coherent sentences you can get into these games.

Hardest: No real hard places to get into. Then again I haven't really apped into any games at since the start of the new year. Sex games are nitpicky and Save the Earth could be still nitpicky but that may have changed with the new mods in charge.

(Anonymous) 2014-07-12 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I think sex game apps tend to be nitpicky because they know people are going to toss characterization out the door pretty quick anyway, so they want to at least look like they have standards.

Re: Is it true?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 03:43 am (UTC)(link)
I tried to app a VG character to Amat who said "I'm sorry, Daddy" every time her HP hit 0. In my app I referenced that and wrote a bit about the character having daddy issues based on that death mechanic, and the mods rejected the app citing that as the reason. Be...cause I might have gotten into some May/December stuff with an older character? (but it's DWRP so lbr it'd be more like May/June at best). To this day I'm not sure what the big deal was. Any time you bring a character from a nonsmut canon and bring them into a smut settings, you're going to be pulling kinks out of headcanon.

Re: Is it true?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 07:05 am (UTC)(link)
the two kinks banned outright from amat are underage and bestiality. maybe they thought you intended to play around with an underage dynamic. not saying that's it for sure. it could be part of it.

DA

(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)
How would that even work, anon? I thought characters were aged up to 18 upon entrance.

Re: DA

(Anonymous) 2014-07-15 04:38 pm (UTC)(link)
somebody aging them up physically but trying to play them as mentally still underaged. mention of daddy kink is a red flag for that sort of thing.

Re: Is it true?

(Anonymous) 2014-07-15 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
actually, i'd say you got rejected for pulling daddy issues out of your ass based on a single line said upon death.

+1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-15 08:43 am (UTC)(link)
Amat is super strict about the NO HEADCANON rule in their apps.