rpanons | Snores passive aggressively

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

first off, you're not 'sa', you're 'ayrt'. sa would be if the anon you replied to had something extra to add.

secondly, as a da, i'm going to jump in here and say they were making a pun, which is why the k is in brackets. it's corruption of champions, but they were turning the acronym into a pun in relation to it being a sex game. coc + k = cock.

thirdly, i think you mean non-porn option, since the entire basis of coc is porn. you fuck, you eat, you drink, you rape/get raped and your body changes in response to your trials. sure, you could feasibly try to make a non-porn version, but you'd have to explain how someone was getting corrupted to that extent. fucking an imp/satyr/magical tentacle plant is easier to explain than 'they took the wrong path'.

You almost never transform your body when you get fucked by/fuck a monster in CoC, though. You get corrupted but that's a personality thing rather than physical. The tentacle monster is a weird exception because clitterference.

You might be thinking about another, similar game.

Snores passive aggressively

Re: SA

da