rpanons | Oh beautiful, for spacious posts

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

It's canon until something else contradicts it. For what it's worth, when Van Lente was interviewed about the tie-in comic for Cap 2, he also confirmed that MCU Natasha isn't the age she is in the comics.

I didn't think she was. I just wouldn't be surprised if her actual birth year winds up being something different when they finally get around to giving her origin story, mostly because the KGB namedrop is utterly nonsensical with the current timeline.

Either way, I find the reference amusing, whether it's in-universe or just for audience consumption.

Child soldier in the last days of the Cold War, maybe?

Could also be wackiness brought about by alternate universes and various real life events lasting for a different duration in the MCU.

That's true too. Another possibility is that she actually worked for the SVR but since more people are used to the name KGB, they went with that instead.

Oh beautiful, for spacious posts

da

ayrt

no subject

da

Re: da