rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2014-01-22 03:32 pm

At first I glances

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Re: CITY OF ARIEL

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 01:48 am (UTC)(link)
or you could deal with it, eh

Re: CITY OF ARIEL

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
well by that logic they should fire all their app mods and just let apps sit for eternity

da

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
how is that the same logic?

or even logic at all

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
'apps are slow. they should get another app mod.'
'deal with it being slow.'
'so even if it moved at a glacial pace it'd be cool?'

not hard to see the thread of logic

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
where does "apps sitting for eternity" play into that

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 10:02 am (UTC)(link)
you made the leap from there to NEVER CHECK APPS EVER

that's what i'm asking about

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 12:42 pm (UTC)(link)
it was comedic exaggeration for the purpose of making a point

god it's like you've never heard a joke before

+1

(Anonymous) 2014-01-23 05:34 pm (UTC)(link)

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 02:13 am (UTC)(link)
you failed to make a point and also failed at being funny

whoops

da

(Anonymous) 2014-01-24 03:52 pm (UTC)(link)
You missed a joke, there's no need to be petulant about it.