rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-12-30 05:31 am

Your privilege at any time is only as strong as the wifi signal

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
negl but since someone mentioned it up there, i do have to admit that i'm suspicious as fuck these days when i see f/f pairings getting popular. i'm a lesbian and i should love it, but a lot of it does appear really disingenuous and like a way to get the women out of the picture. that or as a side pair thing.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
oh shut the fuck up

nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
you are just as bad as the tumblr feminists who care more about fictional women than real women.

like i mentioned downthread, op is a retard but can we not

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)
they *should* shut the fuck up tho

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)
they should. this isn't the place, even if i can see why they'd question it. it's just what you need to keep to your fucking self.

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
even if it was the place it'd still be a silly thing to think

logic like that is why f/f ships so rarely take off, everyone's constantly second guessing themselves and being lectured about 'fetishising lesbianism'

it's like you can ship m/f and m/m all you want but you need to write a 8 paragraph essay to justify f/f, it can never just be 'they're cute together and had a couple of sweet interactions.'

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
also because fandom places like tumblr have a lot of straight girls who think lesbians are icky, lbr

Re: nayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
they're usually the ones who masquerade it as being 'concerned' about 'problematic' ships

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
to be fair when it comes to free

chigusa (gou's friend)/gou has a lot of cute f/f potential

too bad chigusa was only in a couple of scenes

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
NO YOU ARE A TERRIBLE PERSON IF YOU SHIP IT IT CAN'T JUST BE BECAUSE YOU THINK IT'S CUTE

YOU HAVE TO BE A MISOGYNIST

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
oh anon

ur cute too

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
so when is it acceptable to ship something f/f? where do i submit the forms in triplicate? as we all know, lesbianism requires some sort of REASON or LOGIC, it can never be its own thing

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
you are the worst lesbian i have ever seen

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
op is stupid but this kind of shit isn't cute

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
this is why f/f ships are so rare

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYXLAupRn2c

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay I think you've made someone Really Mad (not that I can blame them, this is kind of a stupid opinion, but they should kind of dial it back)

but at the same time, why? You should really reexamine why you feel this way - it just seems kind of gross and ugly. You're defining female characters by male ones even when they're being discussed in a context that's completely devoid of them. Why can't people just ship F/F?

(Anonymous) 2013-12-30 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
okay, i'm probably being the idiot who's taking this in good faith, but i can kind of see where you're coming from? maybe? you almost never see f/f ships that break up popular het ships unless the male in the het equation is part of a popular m/m ship, that's true.

but i think that's looking too much into what probably amounts to "i think x and x are cute together let me press these barbie dolls together"

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
i don't care what the original motivation is as long as the ships getting popular get plenty of gorgeous fanart and great fic. let great f/f arise independently or from people wanting their m/m, as long as the results are great and well-rounded fanworks around female characters i couldn't care less about the origins of the ship.

ngl i've gone into some fandoms thinking i'd be there for the m/m ship and found the work surrounding the f/f ship that arose to make m/m possible 100x better and never looked back. encourage f/f wherever you find it, it is a fragile enough flower without needing its roots unearthed every time for scientific examination.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
You know what, I get what you're saying, but I'll still take that over vilifying, bashing, or otherwise 'punishing' female characters for 'being in the way' of male characters X and Y's true love.

Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
jc, can f/f just be a thing and not have to have reasoning???

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
sometimes i just think two girls would be cute together. that's literally all there is to it.

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-12-31 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
op has some internalized bullshit

(Anonymous) 2014-01-02 09:32 am (UTC)(link)
Clear case of a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders here.