rpanons | Yer wonderful

Rundown:

rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.

CONCERNS | RESOURCES

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

For those interested, we've tried to address some of the problems and offer a formal apology here. Hopefully, we've covered as many concerns as possible!

Edited 2013-07-10 18:45 (UTC)

So does that still mean that characters who weren't raped can't have not being raped as part of their au history?

Assuming that you are referring to the revisions request that started this, we decided that attempted child abuse, even if it was not fully carried out, was traumatic and sensitive enough a subject that we would rather players avoided using it in their AU histories unless it was supported in their original canon.

Eating babies is okay though and OCs can do whatever they want.

u seem mad

when's the last time you knew of someone who'd been molested as a child or in general?

to contrast, when's the last time you knew someone who'd had their baby eaten?

this isn't really hard to figure out. i hate this argument

I guess your parents don't let you watch horror movies by yourself, do they.

ia that the handling of background standards here is wildly inconsistent and generally off-putting, but this is the worst argument you could've come up with

Not the player, but I know this character and for that particular OC it is a part of her original history not something just made up for the AU part. The mun has been playing this character for a while so it's not a "sudden angsty" twist to make her special, she was designed for horror since the beginning.

no it's just longtime edgy tryhard instead

Because she likes to write horror? People like different things anon. People write different things. You don't have to read or play with her you know? Like a mature adult would choose to do.

OP here and consider me greatly soothed, mods. Whatever else has cropped up in this thread since I opened my mouth, the inconsistent handling of abuse in the false AUs was the major thing I was upset about. Like I said, to each their own, and you didn't have to adjust policy on your existing players on account of one wannabe, but I appreciate the change. I have no grudge against the two players above and wouldn't want to join such a small game just to say "don't tag me please" when part of the appeal to me was everyone being members of this same household.

Given there's some bile in the air with some anons thinking I'm a friend of the recent apper, I won't be attempting an app myself any time soon, but I'm happy to be able to consider this game as an option for me again.

Yer wonderful

Re: AUNGIER HOUSE

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

da

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

ayrt

Re: AUNGIER HOUSE