rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-07-08 03:40 pm

Yer wonderful

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Re: AUNGIER HOUSE

(Anonymous) 2013-07-10 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
OP and buttmad, yes, but not that player. Butthurt because I really wanted to join a small, slow, no-network prose game, but not with gamemates with a rape/abuse plot in their invented AU.

So I'm butthurt because I want to know why those two AUs weren't rejected with an ongoing rape, while the AUs with an avoided rape in the AU backstory was.

Not defending that player's text wall response at all. Irritated by the mod(s)'s inconsistency, yes, since I could've joined the game if they rejected unnecessary abuse AUs across the board.

da

(Anonymous) 2013-07-10 05:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I suspect that this probably comes down to the mods favoring their friends tbh. It's still bad modding either way but it's nothing new.