rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-07-08 03:40 pm

Yer wonderful

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-10 08:48 am (UTC)(link)
not only that, but everything the kanda player cited about same-sex relationships between men and boys being a normal and codified part of that era is true too. like it or not, it was a part of japan. you can't just erase that to make it "politically correct."

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-10 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Only actually it was completely out of place for both the time period and the social class/occupation of the people involved. At basically no point in Japanese history was it common or accepted for working class fishermen to keep pretty young boys as sex slaves. The player was trying to justify the controversial and unnecessary backstory with "history" that wasn't even correct, and they got very pedantic about it. Responding that way to a fairly minor revision request is a huge red flag for a mod, and I think they made the right choice.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-11 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
>to keep pretty young boys as sex slaves
>to keep as sex slaves
>keep sex slaves

Jeeze. What did reading comprehension ever do to you, anon?