rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-05-02 06:10 pm

Nobody flicks me in the butt without my consent

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS | USERNAME SUGGESTIONS

GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Re: INSTITUTE

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 08:06 am (UTC)(link)
Doesn't make it not mean-spirited as hell.

Stupid as their decision was, I don't think they took the time out of their day to decide how to deliberately fuck everyone in the game over.

Re: INSTITUTE

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
its not really "mean spirited" to be upset with someone for this kind of act and then complain about them in a place dedicated to exactly that kind of complaining.

Have you even looked at the namedrops? They are even pretty mild on the scale of namedrops, but its basically just going "here are these people, here are the things they have done in the past to rouse my ire" rather than the usual level of mindless vitriol found there.

op

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 06:02 pm (UTC)(link)
If it had stayed in the Institute thread it would have made sense, but dragging it to a different section on wankgate meant to personally shame them seems like overkill.

I did read it, and people are digging up stuff they did in games they don't even play at anymore.

Re: op

(Anonymous) 2013-05-07 06:05 pm (UTC)(link)
So? They still did it. Just because you did something shitty in the past doesn't mean you're absolved of it after x span of time. Especially if you're still doing it.

ayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Then by all means, continue your crusade of justice to rip on the fact that two of the mods are married, among other personal details.

You guys are not getting my sympathy.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
Of course they aren't, seeing you're a mod desperately trying to whiteknight yourself.

Try to be less obvious next time, and change that writing style a bit.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 04:58 am (UTC)(link)
... dude, no. Not even a little bit.

I shouldn't laugh but holy shit wow.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
anon loses legs to stand on at getting called out by a reasonable person.

annnnd immediately counters with "hi mod" instead of making a good argument.

Re: ayrt

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't know the story regarding that personal detail, so it's understandable you'd think it's baseless. Annie mentioned they were married in her post on the mod plurk by the way, so it's not exactly an OMG big secret anyway?

da

(Anonymous) 2013-05-08 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
uhm it's not saying "they're married" that's the problem here?

it's going "THEIR MARRIAGE IS ONLY BASED ON THEIR SHIPPING" and marveling at the fact that someone you don't like could get married at all that's mean-spirited and does not belong in this discussion at all

i find the way that they closed the game down clumsy and dumb, but when people try to dig up all the old shit and grudgewank that they can sling... well, it's just sad

op

(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
My point exactly.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Again, you don't know, and that's fine.
I'm not above pointing to their dirty laundry, but I'm not going to actually air it. So that's that.