rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-03-08 07:01 pm

It's raw you donkey

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS

USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

OP

(Anonymous) 2013-03-11 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
If this were an all-prose game though, which I'm leaning towards, there wouldn't be any way to spam out a completed thread in an hour. Even shorter prose tags move slowly compared to most action tags. Someone who's really determined to character squat could probably find a way around the rule, though.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-03-11 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Even in prose you can have a thread run like:

He walked up to the person "Hey"

and then back/forth. There was a lot of that in a game I played in before, Thusia. Technically it's still prose because of the formatting anyway.

OP

(Anonymous) 2013-03-11 04:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, you're right. I really like threads with more substance than that... I might try requiring participation in some kind of monthly plotting discussion plost in addition to just AC. Then people can work out some plots for the month, and hopefully at least have some incentive to get threads started. And I want some way to penalize serial thread droppers so they can't get a bunch of people tangled up in plots that won't finish (which has contributed to the death of some games I've been in.)

previous anon

(Anonymous) 2013-03-11 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
completed threads might be a good idea in theory, but like the da above mentioned, it's easy to say a thread is finished esp. with super fast prose tagging.

requiring participation in monthly plotting doesn't seem all that likely to work in my experience, since some people prefer to do their plotting more casually and without guidelines. idk, maybe you could require people to have some kind of check-in with NPC higher-ups at the end of every month or week to make sure that they're actually making progress or development, since it's a plot-based game.

other previous anon

(Anonymous) 2013-03-11 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
What about this. One of my older games way before lj or dw used to have an interesting ac check. You had to list 3 examples of what your character did during that month. So basically you'd explain the plots in a couple sentences, link to them, and the logs themselves had to substantiate your claim. So they didn't have to be finished but it couldn't be 3 or 4 tags of characters greeting each other either. The meat of your claim had to be present.

OP

(Anonymous) 2013-03-12 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
That's actually a really interesting way of doing it! I might have to try that. Conventional AC that's based on # of comments hasn't worked very smoothly in my other games, because prose players tend to backtag their high-wordcount, low-commentcount posts for a long time. I'm willing to experiment with alternate types of AC and see what players like. As long as people are reasonably active and they're not dropping threads or leaving other players hanging all the time, I'm not too picky.