rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-03-01 04:52 pm

Preserve your precious virginity

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS

USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 07:44 pm (UTC)(link)
What 'different kind' are you mentioning?

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
well outright stating 'we are a safe space/safe haven for paedophiles and rapists to relive their crimes for personal pleasure' isn't exactly a deterrent for people doing that.

SA

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I also can't imagine many of us with kinks on the extreme/illegal irl side of things much appreciate the risk of being lumped in with IRL perpetrators for our fantasies that are firmly separated from reality.*

*unless they're at furry tier of geek social fallacies, in which case there was no hope and they were probably already lumped in with IRL paedophiles and bestiality enthusiasts.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
So can every self-reported rapist/cannibal/animal abuser/extremely violent abuser with IRL history get banned from the love hotel thereafter, if the mods set this precedent? Regardless of their activity/behavior in the comm itself?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
who really wants their comm associated with people who brag about shit like that tho?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
tbh I like the idea of comms having a precedent like that (especially if they also respond to proven IRL convictions as well,) even if it would get only minimal use.

I mean who really wants to be in a comm with or associate with people who are basically bragging about how many people/animals/children they raped irl? Even if they didn't actually do it, it's kind of fucked up to brag about that shit and most sensible people, especially sensible kinksters, don't want to be associated with that shit.

Hell in a comm like this I'd probably also kick people who are going on about how much they really, really want to commit rape in real life (but haven't made any claims to having actually done it) as well because I'd not want my comm associated with those people either, but eh, it's not my comm and that shit isn't nearly as bad as people claiming to have actually done it.

But as I said I'm also not opposed to watching comms being wanked into oblivion for an insane devotion to the geek social fallacies. Though I'd probably take a few steps back from it because hooooly shit do those kinds of reputations do seem to stick with communities and their members forever.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
why

why would you not be okay with this?

idgaf if literally every rapist or abuser was banned from tlh. i don't care about their fucking feefees.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 04:02 am (UTC)(link)
is this really a question? why would that be a bad thing?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
sounds like a great idea to me

how much of a misanthrope do you have to be to wring your hands over whether it's a good idea to ban people with IRL history of reprehensible shit from using your comm as an outlet to relive their crimes?

which do you think is more painful anon?

a poor IRL rapist not being able to relieve their crimes and wallow in their twisted impulses via rp or a survivor finding out they'd unknowingly been used by an IRL rapist to get their rocks off via rp?

whose ~freedom~ and comfort really fucking matters here?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
Yes.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 04:43 am (UTC)(link)
sounds like a great idea tbh.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 07:54 am (UTC)(link)
did you like, murder some dude and fuck the body and are now worried you might not be able to both gloat and play in tlh at the same time?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes.

Wait, you were saying that was a BAD THING?
what the everlasting fuck

(Anonymous) 2013-03-08 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
I'd say that depends: Are they going to confess said crimes in the sole interest of garnering pity, and refuse to leave if a majority of the player base and/or survivors within the player base expresses discomfort with their presence?
eleventh_hour: (Default)

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

[personal profile] eleventh_hour 2013-03-06 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not a safe space for rapists. My point is that it's not a safe space for anybody, and it's not intended to be.

I'm not going to stop anyone from doing anything off-community-- that includes crimes, even very, very serious ones. I am not the police. I am not the morality police. I'm also not going to protect those people that do commit crimes from the backlash of their own actions, such as things like "Storm Watch" or something similar with Ken, as long as it doesn't happen on TLH.

Once again, I will only police one thing, and that is people's behavior while they are posting on TLH/TLH OOC. That is all.

If you can't read between the lines here, I don't know what else to tell you, anons.
eleventh_hour: (Default)

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

[personal profile] eleventh_hour 2013-03-06 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, also, once again, you're also welcome to PM me or private plurk me to discuss this further, in private, if you wish, or to bring up any concerns.

I'm sort of responding officially here to the issue in general, but I've already stated several times, and will continue to state, that even if I were to reconsider my stance on this, it would not be because of anon pressures in anon-comms. There are official ways to complain about someone on TLH. You can make a post at the Contact the Mods post on the community, you can PM this journal or [personal profile] sparkworkers or send me a private plurk at [plurk.com profile] sextonviolets. That's three different ways you can officially contact myself and the other mods about concerns on TLH and discuss this matter further.

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Did you miss the part where my official stance is I'm totally cool with shit like this completely wrecking the comms shit?

I'm not here is help, this is expression of intent to laugh at you if the comm burns.

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
hey, quick question. was your spine removed after you became a mod, or were you chosen specifically for your resemblance to the common jellyfish?

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
This is actually reading between the lines. When I say safe space I don't mean 'protection from being people being mean' or 'protection from triggers' as much as 'we will allow you to further indulge your criminal activities on the comm,' which is indeed what you are presenting.

I mean shit, are you just completely unaware of why furry fandom is so universally reviled instead of just an internet oddity? Or how most kink circles make an effort to distance themselves from irl criminal activity?

This isn't policing as much as choosing how you want the comm to be represented.

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
you are letting a self-confessed child rapist continue to indulge in his fantasies

this isn't a grey area. given that he actually RAPED KIDS IRL, this is a step closer to helping him offend that no one should be okay with.

so yeah, you are giving him a safe space, and as a childhood sexual assault survivor who's actually been at tlh and enjoyed my time here since its inception on LJ, fuck you with a razorblade sideways.

i wish we had elf back, and i fucking hated her.

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 02:54 am (UTC)(link)

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 04:58 am (UTC)(link)
How socially stunted do you have to fucking be to quibble about whether it's a good idea to ban an IRL child rapist from using your comm to play out child rape?

The decent human being bar you need to cross here is so fucking low it's underground.

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 06:40 am (UTC)(link)
Not to mention, if the whole point of your comments here is that basically you don't give a shit, why are you even a mod? Why does TLH have mods if they won't even step in in a situation like this when there should be no question at all whether this is a bad idea? Because it is. You don't have to be the police or "moral police" or what the fuck ever to realize this is fucked up and you should take the small step to do something about it.

Re: THE LOVE HOTEL

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 03:21 am (UTC)(link)
are you just a fan of rapists or something? because what I'm getting from this is you refuse to judge a child rapist. you APPROVE of a child rapist. what the fuck is wrong with you?

worse yet, you approve of a known child rapist playing out his fantasies with unknowing participants. you're fucking sick.

Repeating this, since the asshole mod here seems to have missed it:

(Anonymous) 2013-03-07 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
You approve of a known child rapist playing out his fantasies with unknowing participants.