rpanonmod ([personal profile] rpanonmod) wrote in [community profile] rpanons2013-03-01 04:52 pm

Preserve your precious virginity

Rundown: [community profile] rpanons is an anonymous community for role-play related topics. This place serves as a forum for game discussions, canon discussions, RP solicitations (ATP, game ads, open memes), and advice. The occasional off topic comment is inevitable, but please keep heated social and political topics to their respective communities. Posting them here will only get them frozen. Subsequent threads made to bypass a freeze will then be deleted.

Rules:

Do not post pornographic or shocking images.
Do not share private entries, plurks, chat logs, etc.
Do not use this community as your social/political/hatespeech soapbox.
Do not be redundant. One page does not need three or more threads on one topic/theme.
Do not treat this comm like your personal Plurk or Twitter. Off-topic happens, but it should be open for discussion and not just a play-by-play of your life. No one cares.


CONCERNS | RESOURCES


Navigate:

LATEST PAGE | GAME DISCUSSIONS | CANON DISCUSSIONS | HTML/GRAPHIC HELP

OPEN MEMES | ATP/ENABLE ME | GAME ADVERTISEMENTS | PB SUGGESTIONS

USERNAME SUGGESTIONS | GAME IDEAS | CHARACTER ADVICE | RP WITH ME

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
i kinda get the feeling the cap is more this: http://headmasterhand.dreamwidth.org/1366.html?thread=529494#cmt529494 or maybe this was the straw that broke the mod's back since it's the same date the 2 per mun cap went back up

but i also agree with the other anon, putting a total fandom cap on is too much imo. i don't think we need to go that far since there's a lot of cool pokemon and trainers around. this is just a problem with probably two or three, maybe four muns if you squint.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
oh wow ya probably

and oh no!!!! i meant a fandom cap per player lmfao sorry