no, anon. 'we' are not. you are. the rest of the comm is capable of actually treating things as they are. you don't get to relabel because it doesn't suit your narrative.
the comm suggested will 'allow' relationship memes (ship, btw, in case you didn't know it), so if they'll allow that and not smut, then there is a clear definition between the two, and lumping them together when doing a count to prove how skewed the numbers are is not okay.
especially when what the fuck did you expect? you might not count it as 3 categories, but the actual comm does. so it's evenly distributed. you're not making a point. you're trying to start an argument over semantics and you've got them wrong. 'wah, this comm that caters to everything is evenly ratioed between them and there's the same amount of gen as there is everything else. i feel like gen is getting flooded out, even though it's pretty evenly portrayed. wah'.
no subject
the comm suggested will 'allow' relationship memes (ship, btw, in case you didn't know it), so if they'll allow that and not smut, then there is a clear definition between the two, and lumping them together when doing a count to prove how skewed the numbers are is not okay.
especially when what the fuck did you expect? you might not count it as 3 categories, but the actual comm does. so it's evenly distributed. you're not making a point. you're trying to start an argument over semantics and you've got them wrong. 'wah, this comm that caters to everything is evenly ratioed between them and there's the same amount of gen as there is everything else. i feel like gen is getting flooded out, even though it's pretty evenly portrayed. wah'.