well gee, mom. i'm sorry i didn't sugar coat my suggestions/advice. i'll be sure to slather on the lotion so i don't get the hose again next time. none of the ones that i said were salty or kink pushy. sure, there were encouraging buttpatty ones (which isn't a bad thing, don't go putting words in my mouth), but i shouldn't have to coddle someone with a suggestion on an anon comm over a game they stated that they likely weren't going to make and might hand off to someone else. in which case, the aspect of them not even liking dubcon/noncon becomes irrelevant, since maybe whoever picks it up wouldn't mind and hey, there you go. the supposed mod got defensive over the ideas, which is fine, but they kept trying to justify it as a necessity, when it wasn't. it was just preference. don't say one thing and mean another. that's shitty mod communication and likely wouldn't go over well in a game anyway.

i really wish people would learn what things are. i use words to describe how i feel and what i mean. would you rather i just limit it to 'lmao w/e i do what i want no you'? articulation shouldn't be proof of overinvestment. it just means i have things to say and i'm saying them. like, wow. sorry for writing in a writing hobby on a comm about other people's writing. didn't mean to wear out your eyes.

if you want to keep thinking that's why games aren't being made, you go ahead. but games are still being made, and some of them even keep going on, contrary to your sensitivity to people not agreeing with you. and try using another word, because toxic isn't the right one. that's like trying to throw triggered and problematic around. it's an actual thing. don't water it down with 'i object to this, therefor it's toxic.'

or not. i'm just overinvested, after all. and a toxic tittybaby that isn't allowed an opinion because potential mods are marshmallows.