it's no problem. after i read it, this is what i can say in regards to the f.a.q:
* what will happen to characters who are not human in their canon like robots/etc? i think we discussed this in the past that they would be just assumed to be a 'funny-looking tin gentleman/lady?'
* you should put in the mentioned character cap per player in the rules! just so all information is in one place. you can still keep it in the reservations to reinforce/remind people about it.
* do you want this to be a small game or a medium-ish game? you mentioned before you want it to be streamlined so maybe having a player cap later on in the game would benefit everyone. just let everyone app in in the first few months, see how it goes and decide if you need that many people currently or need a few more to get it going.
* and like i said earlier, its prolly best you can do with improving ac is limit the number of threads players are allowed to use. that way someone doesn't hand over five 2-comment threads. otherwise its reasonable imo.
also for the sake of it, i don't think you need to mention 'wankgate' in the rules. when making rules, you generally try not to name drop or name an exact thing/player to avoid ruffling people's feathers.
no subject
* what will happen to characters who are not human in their canon like robots/etc? i think we discussed this in the past that they would be just assumed to be a 'funny-looking tin gentleman/lady?'
* you should put in the mentioned character cap per player in the rules! just so all information is in one place. you can still keep it in the reservations to reinforce/remind people about it.
* do you want this to be a small game or a medium-ish game? you mentioned before you want it to be streamlined so maybe having a player cap later on in the game would benefit everyone. just let everyone app in in the first few months, see how it goes and decide if you need that many people currently or need a few more to get it going.
* and like i said earlier, its prolly best you can do with improving ac is limit the number of threads players are allowed to use. that way someone doesn't hand over five 2-comment threads. otherwise its reasonable imo.
also for the sake of it, i don't think you need to mention 'wankgate' in the rules. when making rules, you generally try not to name drop or name an exact thing/player to avoid ruffling people's feathers.