Someone wrote in [community profile] rpanons 2014-01-04 06:25 am (UTC)

This is what I thought it must look like. We know this time it's definitely not someone in the game or at least not in the game anymore because they commented on the worst possible thing to make accusations of cliquishness for. Almost no districts have much CR between the characters in them. You can actually factually prove it's baseless this time just by looking through the character tags because you can't claim cliquishness if the people rarely play with each other.

My suggestion to players would be every time you feel the urge to get defensive don't comment and go prove the anon wrong by tagging a new person. While I've never seen it come up also make sure you stay open to someone who claims they have clique problems if they say it logged in or make a reasonable comment on your hmds.

If no one argues back and anyone actually looking at the game sees people tagging around it's the best take-that you could manage and good for the game anyway. Then they'll just look pathetic trying to kick off wank so many times in the game threads in a row.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting