Someone wrote in [community profile] rpanons 2013-03-14 03:10 pm (UTC)

Just because this is not a wank community does not mean it absolves it from any sort of negativity.

Because someone is not linking their threads and dissecting it as to why it's bland or why it is unacceptable does not mean it does not exist. While in most cases I would say the burden of proof is on the one giving crit (or complaining), I disagree in this instance. If I were to link my threads with people who I find boring and uninspired, it would out who I am; if I used a friend's threads, it could be them. I'm not going to start witch hunts.

That being said, Froda and Eric are universally considered difficult to deal with. Not just in Tu Shanshu, but also in Ataraxion and Cape & Cowl. It is up to them to change, not me to crit them. They have been critted multiple times about the exact same things only for them to fall on deaf ears. These two are not critted because they will not change and you can't go to a moderator with "they didn't exactly say this but they implied it" or "they put no effort into their tags" (though this goes not only for Eric, but most people in this game who are repeatedly namedropped).

There is nothing hostile about this comment so it shouldn't be met with hostility. Saying I dislike someone/s and how they play and saying that they are thoughtless without giving specific instances does not make it untrue.

Additionally, there is a huge difference between wank and a discussion. Even if it isn't worded politely, that doesn't make it wank. Even if it is negative, that does not make it wank. Wank is stirring shit for the sake of stirring shit or "spewing bs" as you put it. Saying Kiki and Hina and That Pepper are difficult to tag is not wank. Saying Eric and Froda don't take well to crit is not wank.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting